Type 052D DDG Overview

<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"> <table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody> <tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhe5WkUg-aXfqIja24zeAFTelf_l2ohKaVox8mPIOivbIkIGtQPwMNpYLGmAAOJV9skc2nsH9MS74MrYI9QXHe1KXkk6mwUYGnU9C3QUdwf6uiJdKGBV1w1wTNsIGkdO6yGLg7vc9sxtuM/s1600/Type+052D+DDG.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="234" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhe5WkUg-aXfqIja24zeAFTelf_l2ohKaVox8mPIOivbIkIGtQPwMNpYLGmAAOJV9skc2nsH9MS74MrYI9QXHe1KXkk6mwUYGnU9C3QUdwf6uiJdKGBV1w1wTNsIGkdO6yGLg7vc9sxtuM/s640/Type+052D+DDG.jpg" width="640" /></a></td></tr> <tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://plarealtalk.com/2015/11/23/profile-052d-class-destroyer/" target="_blank">Type 052D DDG</a></td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"> </td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"> </td></tr> </tbody></table> <br /> <h2>  </h2> <h2> Background:</h2> The 052D class DDG is the successor to the 052C class anti air warfare DDG. 052D inherits the same overall hull and certain weapons and sensors from its predecessor, and fields an identical propulsion arrangement, but also boasts many improved capabilities such as a new type of main gun, an improved active phased array radar (APAR), as well as a much improved vertical launch system (VLS) with greater cell count. It is likely that 052D also boasts substantial internal upgrades such as improved combat management systems, a more modern combat information centre (CIC) and generally more capable mission related software and hardware.<br /> <br /> Ancestry of the 052D class can be traced back to the original two ship 052 class DDGs commissioned in 1994, through to the improved 052B class DDG, and the Chinese Navy’s first aegis type long range AAW 052C class DDG. Each of these classes pioneered new capabilities for the Chinese Navy. The 052 class was the first Chinese Navy surface combatant equipped with gas turbines and various imported western combat management systems and sensors which would help guide development of indigenous combat systems and integration aboard future warships. The 052B class DDG was the first domestically produced surface combatant fielding an area air defence capability via the imported Russian naval Shtil SAM, however only two were produced. The 052C class DDG in turn was the Chinese Navy’s first surface combatant equipped with an advanced multifunction APAR providing fixed 360 degree coverage as well as the first Chinese warship equipped with a VLS and a naval SAM capable of true long range coverage through the HHQ-9. 052C enjoyed a longer production run than its successors, reaching six ships after a multi-year delay in production after the first pair were produced.<br /> <br /> 052D fields a more compact, more multi-role and generally more capable VLS compared to 052C, and is equipped with an improved variant of the Type 346 APAR dubbed the Type 346A, and also features new weapons systems such as a new 130mm gun designated PJ-38 and the HQ-10 missile CIWS. 052D is also the most stealthy 052 derivative (despite far from approaching the very low observable nature of the Zumwalt class DDG), and likely fields the newest generation of combat management systems, datalinking, and command capabilities.<br /> <br /> However, despite the impressive qualitative advancements of the 052D class, it is the quantitative factor where 052D is most unique. 052D is the first class of destroyer that the Chinese Navy has immediately produced in serial production since it began its modernization drive in the mid 1990s. Previous Chinese destroyer classes were only produced in pairs, likely due to the Chinese Navy’s need to rapidly test and absorb new technologies and capabilities, but also probably due to the Navy’s relative dissatisfaction for their capabilities compared to international gold standard destroyers such as the US Navy’s Burke class DDG or the Royal Navy’s Type 45 DDG.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://plarealtalk.com/2015/11/23/profile-052d-class-destroyer/" target="_blank">052D</a> production began after 052C production without pause, where the first 052D DDG was launched in late August 2012, barely two months after the sixth and last 052C DDG was launched in mid July 2012. Since then, 052D production has continued, and indeed, production has been expanded to two shipyards rather than one.<br /> <br /> Production of the first eight 052Ds occurred at Jiangnan shipyard at Changxing island near Shanghai, the same shipyard where the entire 052C class were produced. In early 2015, photo evidence finally confirmed long standing rumours that 052Ds were under construction by Dalian shipyard at the northern coastal city of Dalian. Jiangnan shipyard is currently producing 052Ds on one production line in one building hall, and the fact that they have launched seven 052Ds in the span of three years suggests a very impressive and efficient shipyard. Dalian shipyard appears to be constructing two 052Ds simultaneously in parallel, however production at Dalian also seems to be somewhat slower than at Jiangnan.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_277" style="width: 675px;"><img alt="052D production at Jiangnan shipyard, in late March, 2015. Three 052Ds are visible in the fitting basin in the right of the picture, with an additional 052D in transfer drydock" class=" wp-image-277" height="381" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/052d-jiangnan-2-e1448269594918.jpg" width="640" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Google Earth photo of 052D production at Jiangnan shipyard, in late March, 2015. Three 052Ds are visible in the fitting basin in the right of the picture, with an additional 052D in transfer drydock</figcaption></figure> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_274" style="width: 658px;"><img alt="052D production at Dalian. Imagery at Dalian is more difficult to acquire than at Jiangnan, but it is enough to ascertain that two vessels are likely currently under construction in parallel" class=" wp-image-274" height="482" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/052d-dalian.jpg" width="640" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">052D production at Dalian. Imagery at Dalian is more difficult to acquire than at Jiangnan, but it is enough to ascertain that two vessels are likely currently under construction in parallel</figcaption></figure> The first 052D was commissioned in late March 2014, and a second 052D was commissioned in early August 2015, with a third vessel expected to be commissioned in late 2015 or early 2016. At time of writing, two 052Ds are commissioned, three 052Ds are in various stages of sea trials, and another two 052Ds are currently being fitted out, with one further 052D expected to be launched in late 2015 or early 2016, all at Jiangnan shipyard alone. Dalian shipyard is simultaneously constructing two 052Ds and is expected to launch its first 052D in early 2016, and its second 052D in late 2016 or early 2017.<br /> As of present, the consensus exists that that twelve 052Ds were ordered by the Chinese Navy, with eight ships to be constructed by Jiangnan shipyard and four by Dalian. Considering the rate of work at both shipyards, it is conceivable that all twelve 052Ds may enter service by or before 2020.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_271" style="width: 657px;"><img alt="Lead ship, DDG 172 Kunming was commissioned in March 2014" class=" wp-image-271" height="456" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/052d-172.jpg" width="640" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Lead ship, DDG 172 Kunming was commissioned in March 2014</figcaption></figure> However, recent rumours have also posited that the Chinese Navy may order a further twelve 052Ds for a total production run of twenty four ships. If such rumours are true, then projection of when  twenty four 052Ds may enter service is complicated by the expected 055 class large DDG within the next few years, which is expected to be produced at both Jiangnan shipyard and Dalian shipyard in not-insubstantial numbers as well. However, assuming 052D production at both shipyards is maintained without pause to fulfill a further twelve 052Ds, it is plausible that a full twenty four 052Ds could be commissioned by the early 2020s, even alongside initial construction of the 055 class.<br /> <br /> But even assuming “only” twelve 052D class DDGs are produced, this number of warships combined with the six 052C class DDGs will provide the Chinese Navy with a substantial number of modern aegis type surface combatants by 2020.<br /> Mass production of the 052D class DDG will likely do for the Chinese Navy’s destroyer fleet what the 054A class FFG has done for the Chinese Navy’s frigate fleet – specifically, the 052D class DDG will finally provide the Chinese Navy a modern, competitive destroyer class with qualitative capabilities in strategically relevant and flexible quantities.<br /> <br /> <hr /> <h2> General Specifications:</h2> <h3> Dimensions and Layout</h3> Dimensions of the 052D class are generally similar to its 052C class predecessor, and picture evidence suggests no meaningful difference in either length (155 meters) or beam (17 meters). 052D may feature a slightly increased displacement compared to 052C, and some open sources have speculated a maximum displacement of 7,500 tons. Official disclosures from Chinese state media and the Chinese military do not seem to be available, however they also may deliberately under-represent the full displacement of their warships. Therefore, extrapolating from 052C’s estimated actual full displacement, and comparing to other similarly sized warships, 052D may have a full displacement in excess of 7,000 tons, making it a medium to heavy weight surface combatant.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_269" style="width: 646px;"><img alt="An image taken aboard a commercial airliner flying over Jiangnan shows an 052D sitting beside an 052C in the fitting basin. Note the identical dimensions, as well as the noticeably different VLS arrangement between both vessels" class=" wp-image-269" height="485" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/052c-052d-compare.jpg" width="646" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">An image taken aboard a commercial airliner flying over Jiangnan shows an 052D sitting beside an 052C in the fitting basin. Note the identical dimensions, as well as the noticeably different VLS arrangement between both vessels</figcaption></figure> 052D appears to feature the same propulsion as the 052C class, in a Combined Diesel or Gas (CODOG) arrangement, featuring domestically produced QC280 gas turbines, a license produced version of the Ukrainian DN80. Output of the QC280s has been listed at 28 megawatts, however some outlets have suggested it may be lower at only 23 megawatts – this discrepancy may reflect initial shortfalls in performance by early prototypes and trials. Nevertheless, it is expected that 052D would be capable of reaching speeds in excess of 30 knots, similar to the 052C class DDG.<br /> 052D is equipped with a hangar and a helipad both of similar size to the 052C, however the hangar is set in a more aesthetically pleasing centreline within the aft superstructure as opposed to offset port like in 052C.<br /> 052D’s forward superstructure and deckhouse follows the same 052C and Burke style arrangement where four fixed radar arrays dominate the superstructure, however compared to 052C, each array is wider, necessitating an associated modification in overall proportions and scaling. As a a result of these small modifications, 052D’s superstructure appears to be more pleasing to the eye than 052C.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_291" style="width: 232px;"><img alt="052Cs superstructure and deckhouse" class=" wp-image-291" height="400" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/052c-bridge.jpg" width="397" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">052Cs superstructure and</figcaption>deckhouse</figure> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_292" style="width: 315px;"><img alt="052Ds superstructure and deckhouse, noticeably more attractive than that of its predecessor" class=" wp-image-292" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/052d-bridge.jpg" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">052Ds superstructure and deckhouse, noticeably more attractive than that of its predecessor</figcaption></figure> <h3> Armament</h3> The first most visible difference in armament between 052D and 052C, is the 052D’s substantially larger main gun. 052D’s main gun is the PJ-38 130mm gun, and is a highly modernized, single barrel version of the Russian AK-130 equipped aboard the Navy’s Sovremenny class DDGs first bought from Russia in the early 2000s. The PJ-38 is thought to be a substantially more reliable and capable gun than the 052C’s 100mm French main gun design, not only fielding a larger calibre (and thus with associated larger shell size and greater range) but is also said to be able to fire a variety of extended range munitions, smart munitions, and air defence munitions, thus increasing the flexibility of 052D’s anti surface and anti air capabilities overall.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_288" style="width: 630px;"><img alt="PJ-38 130mm gun aboard 052D compared to the older 100mm gun aboard 052C next to it" class=" wp-image-288" height="442" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/pj-38-vs-100mm.jpg" width="630" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">PJ-38 130mm gun aboard 052D compared to the older 100mm gun aboard 052C next to it</figcaption></figure> 052D fields the same PJ-12 seven barrel 30mm CIWS as the 052C on its bow CIWS platform, however the aft PJ-12 aboard 052C has been replaced by a 24 cell HQ-10 SAM based CIWS on the helicopter hangar. This CIWS arrangement is somewhat reminiscent of the Republic of Korea Navy’s Sejong class DDG which fields a RIM-116 RAM launcher on the bow platform and a Goalkeeper CIWS aft. Regardless, 052D’s differing CIWS arrangement is likely reflective of careful analyses by the Chinese Navy, and the HQ-10 CIWS may provide certain capabilities which a PJ-12 lacks.<br /> 052D is also equipped with other standard weapons seen aboard Chinese Navy surface combatants, such as two triple 324mm torpedo launchers in aft locations behind enclosed doors, and also four eighteen tube flare, chaff and rocket launchers atop the helicopter hangar.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_286" style="width: 560px;"><img alt="HQ-10 CIWS SAM is mounted atop the hangar structure aboard 052D" class="size-full wp-image-286" height="397" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/hq-10-sam-e1448269476904.jpg" width="640" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">HQ-10 CIWS SAM is mounted atop the hangar structure aboard 052D</figcaption></figure> But 052D’s most substantial improvement in weapons systems over the 052C class is its new VLS, and 052D is equipped with 64 such VLS cells, 32 cells bow and 32 cells aft. The 052D’s VLS differs from the 052C’s VLS as it is arranged in rectangular modules with eight canisters each similar to the 054A’s VLS or the US Navy’s Mk-41 VLS or the European SYLVER. However, 052D’s VLS is in turn different to those other rectangular VLS due to the lack of a central exhaust vent. This interesting design was clarified through a surprisingly detailed “leak” of a national military standard (Guojia Junyong Biaozhun) document (5860-2006 standard) describing a new VLS system capable of both cold launch and hot launch of missiles. Exhaust from hot launched missiles are not vented through a common vent (like the other aforementioned hot launch VLS types), but rather through individual canisters, in a “concentric canister launch” (CCL) method where exhaust is vented between through a space between an “inner” and “outer” canister wall of each VLS cell. This is not dissimilar to the Royal Navy’s VLS for its previous generation Sea Wolf SAM, however 052D’s CCL likely features square “inner” and “outer” canisters rather than circular for the Sea Wolf.<br /> <br /> GJB 5860-2006 also describes the new VLS as capable of firing multiple types of weapons, including quad packed weapons, and comes in three lengths: 9 meters, 7 meters and 3.3 meters, similar to the strike length, tactical length and self defence length variants of Mk-41. Therefore, the new Chinese Navy VLS (CN VLS, for the purposes of discussion) is likely to be the new standardized, universal, and future-proof VLS armament aboard all future Chinese navy surface combatants for the early to mid 21st century, and possibly beyond, similar to the US Navy’s Mk-41 VLS.<br /> <br /> Any surface combatant equipped with the 9 meter length CN VLS (as would be expected aboard a medium to large sized warship like 052D) would thus theoretically capable of carrying and launching a significant variety of future Chinese Naval missiles so long as they are adapted for the CN VLS. In the foreseeable future, 052D’s CN VLS will likely be capable of firing the long range HHQ-9 SAM and its newer derivatives, the medium range HHQ-16 SAM and its newer derivatives, and new quad packed medium range SAMs that may be under development. Other weapons likely to be integrated aboard 052D includes the elusive new generation YJ-18 AShM, a new vertically launched ASROC type weapons such as the Yu-8/CY-5, or as well as a land attack cruise missile such as a navalized KD-10/DF-10 variant, which would provide the Chinese Navy a land attack capability similar to Tomahawk equipped US destroyers and cruisers.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_268" style="width: 574px;"><img alt="Detail of the CN VLS aboard 052D, shown here is the 32 bow cells" class="size-full wp-image-268" height="258" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/052-bow-detail.jpg" width="640" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Detail of the CN VLS aboard 052D, shown here are the 32 bow cells</figcaption></figure> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_289" style="width: 577px;"><img alt="32 VLS cells are mounted on the bow of 052D and 32 mounted aft between the hangar superstructure and the aft mast for a total of 64 VLS cells" class=" wp-image-289" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/VLS-detail.jpg" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">32 VLS cells are mounted on the aft between the hangar and aft mast and 32 on the bow, for a total of 64 VLS cells</figcaption></figure> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_284" style="width: 554px;"><img alt="A rare GJB disclosure provided a wealth of information confirming the characteristics and capabilities of the new VLS" class=" wp-image-284" height="411" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/gjb-screen-shot.jpg" width="554" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">A rare GJB disclosure provided a wealth of information confirming the characteristics and capabilities of the new VLS, rare for the Chinese military</figcaption></figure> With 64 VLS canisters, each capable of firing multiple types of weapons, 052D not only enjoys an increase in equivalent firepower compared to an 052C (which is equipped with only 48 single role VLS for HHQ-9 and 8 slant launchers for YJ-62 AShM) by fielding an additional 8 VLS canisters, but also fields substantially more flexibility in conducting various missions including anti surface missions, anti submarine missions, land attack missions, as well as medium range air defence, in addition to standard long range air defence. In future, 052D may also be expected to carry out ballistic missile defence missions through upgrades of its Type 346A radar and integration of future ballistic missile defence weapons.<br /> <br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_202" style="width: 494px;"><img alt="A likely candidate weapon aboard 052D, the HHQ-9 LR SAM" class="size-full wp-image-202" height="330" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/hhq-9-parade-geometry.jpg" width="640" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">A likely candidate weapon aboard 052D, the HHQ-9 LR SAM</figcaption></figure> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_282" style="width: 595px;"><img alt="It is also likely for 052D to be equipped with a naval variant of the DF-10 land attack cruise missile" class=" wp-image-282" height="443" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/df-10-lacm-e1448270480843.jpg" width="640" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">It is also likely for 052D to be equipped with a naval variant of the DF-10 land attack cruise missile</figcaption></figure> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_283" style="width: 615px;"><img alt="052D is likely to also eventually be equipped with a quad packable MR SAM, such as this DK-10 ARH guided SAM with a range of 50km offered for export. Some minor modifications to aerofoils and launch mechanism may ready it for integration onto the new CN VLS" class=" wp-image-283" height="589" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/dk-10-sam-e1448270517493.jpg" width="615" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">052D is likely to also eventually be equipped with a quad packable MR SAM, such as this DK-10 ARH guided SAM with a range of 50km offered for export. Some minor modifications to aerofoils and launch mechanism may ready it for integration onto the new CN VLS</figcaption></figure> <h3> Main Sensors</h3> The 052D’s APAR is an evolution of the Type 346 of 052C, and is designated Type 346A. 052D’s flat array cover suggests a pure liquid cooling arrangement for the radar, compared to a combined liquid and gas cooling for the Type 346.<br /> Type 346A is also noticeably larger than Type 346 and is square shaped rather than rectangular. Picture evidence indicates Type 346A is the same height as Type 346, but is one third wider than Type 346, therefore simple arithmetic indicates an increase in array surface area size by 33.3%. The consequences of this substantial increase in array size may have interesting repercussions for the capability of the radar, especially in terms of peak power.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_204" style="width: 674px;"><img alt="The differing shape and size between the Type 346A of 052D and Type 346 of 052C is highly visible in this picture" class=" wp-image-204" height="380" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/type-346-compare-type-346a.jpg" width="674" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">The differing shape and size between the Type 346A of 052D and Type 346 of 052C is highly visible in this picture</figcaption></figure> Type 346A almost certainly operates in the same S band as Type 346, however it is unknown at this stage if Type 346A may have leveraged recent international advancements in APAR design, such as replacing Gallium Arsenide derived transmit/receive modules with more efficient and higher power Gallium Nitride modules.<br /> The rest of 052D’s sensor suite outwardly appears similar if not identical to that of 052C, with a Type 364 surface search radar atop its main mast, a Type 517 derived 2D UHF band radar atop the aft mast, among other sensors such as a fire control radar for the main gun, ECM arrays, and ELINT arrays.<br /> 052D is also equipped with a bow mounted sonar and appears to feature the relevant ports on the aft for both a towed array sonar and a towed torpedo decoy. It also features a the same model of variable depth sonar as the 056A class corvette and latter 054A class frigates, in a “swing up” door mechanism.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_409" style="width: 571px;"><img alt="" class="wp-image-409 size-full" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/052d-vds.jpg" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">052D class VDS, the same model as that aboard 056A and 054A</figcaption></figure> It is also likely that 052D is equipped with improved datalinks, communications systems and combat management systems compared to 052C, however these are substantially more difficult if not impossible to verify. 052D is also expected to feature an improved CIC compared to 052C, leveraging a new type of console first seen aboard the 056 class corvettes, however photos of 052D’s CIC have yet to definitively emerge.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_287" style="width: 700px;"><img alt="A new console type has been deployed aboard the recent 056 class corvette, and will likely also find its away aboard the 052D class destroyer" class="size-full wp-image-287" height="466" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/new-type-console-circa-2010.jpg" width="700" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">A new console type has been deployed aboard the recent 056 class corvette, and will likely also find its away aboard the 052D class destroyer</figcaption></figure> <hr /> <h2> </h2> <br /> The 052D class DDG improves upon the capabilities of the AAW oriented 052C class DDG, and also introduces true multi-role flexibility by virtue of its new CN VLS which allows mounting of a significant variety of current and future weapons.<br /> <br /> Therefore, in the short term when only small numbers of 052Ds are in service, 052Ds will likely act primarily in the AAW role similar to the 052Cs and act as the primary air defence ship among a task force or a carrier strike group, as well as possibly acting as a command ship for flag officers. 052D will likely mount a variety of AShMs, LACMs, and VL ASROC type weapons in addition to LR SAMs and MR SAMs, but the two latter weapon types will likely make up the bulk of its VLS capacity in the short term, due to the need for a robust air defence capability and a somewhat limited number of true aegis type DDGs to fulfil the mission.<br /> <br /> However, as more 052Ds gradually enter service, such as by 2020 when twelve 052Ds are likely to be operational, it is likely that 052Ds will be mounted with a greater variety of weapons during standard operations, as well as being replaced in the “capital ship” position by new 055 class large DDGs which are expected to enter service around that time and will likely feature substantially enhanced command and AAW capabilities as well as more VLS (possibly up to twice as many compared to a 052D). Thus, the 052D class DDG will provide the Chinese Navy medium-heavy surface combatant with blue water range and endurance, available in large numbers, capable of conducting offensive and defensive operations in the anti surface, anti air, anti submarine and land attack domains as part of a surface action group, a multirole task force, or a carrier strike group. If twenty four 052Ds are ultimately ordered, these capabilities will become even more prevalent, and would convincingly result in the Chinese Navy having second largest fleet of aegis type vessels in the world after the US Navy.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_270" style="width: 661px;"><img alt="Satellite photo of a collection of Chinese Navy surface ships, including two 052Ds, one 052C and two 054As, at Yulin naval base at Hainan island. Serial production of the 052D class will dramatically increase the flexibility and presence of the Chinese Navy surface combatant fleet" class=" wp-image-270" height="392" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/052c-and-052d-yulin.jpg" width="661" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Satellite photo of a collection of Chinese Navy surface ships, including two 052Ds, one 052C and two 054As, at Yulin naval base at Hainan island. </figcaption></figure> <br /> <br /> <hr /> <h2> Conclusion:</h2> The 052D class is an evolutionary advancement of the 052C class, however these advancements are not minor, as they have truly propelled the original humble 052 hull to a world class multi-role aegis type warship capable of conducting a variety of missions with a variety of potential payloads.<br /> But as important as the qualitative improvements of 052D class are, the quantitative production of the 052D is arguably just as important. A production run of twelve 052Ds expected to enter service by 2020 will, along with six preceding 052Cs, provide a robust and moderately large fleet of medium-heavy sized surface combatants capable of comprehensive AAW for a task force or a CSG.<br /> <br /> Twelve 052Ds are also sufficient to provide the core of one to two surface action groups (envisioning each SAG as two 052Ds DDGs with two 054A FFGs, supported by a 903/A class replenishment ship) sufficient to conduct patrol operations in blue water independent for multiple months and to conduct potential US Navy style land attack missions via VLS launched LACMs. Two forward deployed SAGs each assigned with two 052Ds would leave enough 052Ds and 052Cs available to provide the meat of any surface combatant group in the western pacific should the demand for naval confrontation arise (assuming half of the remaining 8 052Ds and 6 052Cs are operational and not under refit). This of course does not consider the 20 remaining 054As in the western pacific available for the Chinese Navy of which two thirds may be operational if the demand called for it (assuming no other blue water deployments), nor does it consider the older non-aegis type DDGs the Chinese Navy will still have in operation such as the four Sovremenny class, two 051C class, two 052B class, and two 052 class.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_280" style="width: 615px;"><img alt="052Ds - they are coming, and they will come in large numbers" class=" wp-image-280" height="346" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/052d-serial-production.jpg" width="615" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">052Ds – they are coming, and they will come in large numbers</figcaption></figure> <br /> <br /> <img alt="052d end possible" class=" wp-image-275 aligncenter" height="463" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/052d-end-possible.jpg" width="640" /><br /> <br /> <br /></div>

Type 052D DDG Overview

Type 052D DDG       Background: The 052D class DDG is the successor to the 052C class anti air warfare DDG. 052D inherits the sam...

Read more »

HHQ-9 naval surface to air missile

<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"> <table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody> <tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjQ3E5iusEIz878qCgUMefBFD3FtpvFbC23rPzOHr1lvpFKcU0r4GRiqsqQYNnjuCo7_vEOIfy40Ms-gMtWpY3fSLxi_bcG8-a2HJwZFQBVuQ6q4qGXLRkjxVW4B0KZh5Mk9UarSs5H9PA/s1600/hhq-9-ignition+-+Copy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img alt="HHQ-9" border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjQ3E5iusEIz878qCgUMefBFD3FtpvFbC23rPzOHr1lvpFKcU0r4GRiqsqQYNnjuCo7_vEOIfy40Ms-gMtWpY3fSLxi_bcG8-a2HJwZFQBVuQ6q4qGXLRkjxVW4B0KZh5Mk9UarSs5H9PA/s640/hhq-9-ignition+-+Copy.jpg" title="HHQ-9" width="438" /></a></td></tr> <tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">HHQ-9 naval surface to air missile </td></tr> </tbody></table> <br /> <br /> The HHQ-9 naval surface to air missile (SAM) is the primary air defence weapon aboard the 052C class DDG, and is likely to be present aboard the improved 052D class DDG, as well as the future 055 class large DDG.<br /> Therefore, HHQ-9 can be considered to be the Chinese Navy’s mainstay long range anti air and anti missile SAM system.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_228" style="width: 481px;"><a href="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/HHQ-9-VLS-detail.jpg"><img alt="HHQ-9 VLS detail aboard 052C, with VLS cover opened" class=" wp-image-228" height="403" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/HHQ-9-VLS-detail.jpg" width="640" /></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">HHQ-9 VLS detail aboard 052C, with VLS cover opened</figcaption></figure> However, considerable ambiguities regarding the capability and the nature of the HHQ-9 still remain, due to a lack of official information regarding the HHQ-9. The capabilities of HHQ-9 are sometimes further confused with that of the land based HQ-9 SAM (from which HHQ-9 is derived) and the export variant FD-2000, but there is reason to believe the naval HHQ-9 may feature some substantial differences to the land based HQ-9 and export FD-2000.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_229" style="width: 579px;"><a href="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/hq-9.jpg"><img alt="Land based HQ-9 SAM system, which the HHQ-9 SAM is derived from" class=" wp-image-229" height="398" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/hq-9.jpg" width="640" /></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Land based HQ-9 SAM system, which the HHQ-9 SAM is derived from</figcaption></figure> <h3> Range:</h3> The HHQ-9’s range is a subject of some debate. It should be prefaced that the effective range of any type of missile is dependent on the target it is assigned to engage – a naval SAM or a beyond visual range air to air missile would have a substantially higher effective range against a high flying, low speed target such as a maritime patrol aircraft, compared to an incoming supersonic cruise missile at low altitude. Therefore, following discussion of HHQ-9’s range is done so in this context, and is assumed to be maximum slant range against a high flying aerial target.<br /> The range for HHQ-9 has been cited between 100 to 120 kilometers; in a report by the US Office of Naval Intelligence, HHQ-9 has been cited as having a range of 55 nautical miles or slightly over 100 kilometers, but the export variant FD-2000 is said to have a range of 120 kilometers, and various Chinese language sources including state media (CCTV) have reported 052C to be equipped with a SAM whose range exceeds 150 kilometers.<br /> Additional confusion exists, one when considers that initial HHQ-9 variants may have been superseded by improved capability HHQ-9 variants with longer range, therefore it is difficult to ascertain just which variant of HHQ-9 may be present aboard current ship classes.<br /> However, taking this array of differing information into consideration, it is possible to judge that the maximum effective range of current variant HHQ-9 is likely to be between 100 kilometers and 150 kilometers.<br /> <br /> <h3> Minimum Altitude:</h3> Ambiguity surrounding HHQ-9’s minimum altitude has received less coverage than that of its maximum range, but it is potentially as equally important.<br /> The minimum altitude of a SAM would very much determine its ability to destroy low flying targets such as sea skimming cruise missiles, especially during the terminal phase.<br /> HHQ-9’s minimum altitude has been cited to be anywhere from 500 meters to 25 meters. The 500 meter altitude has been associated to past brochures for the land based HQ-9, however it is unlikely that the land based HQ-9 would have such a poor minimum altitude given it is insufficient to intercept even relatively low flying aircraft, therefore the 500 meter minimum altitude is likely to be an incorrect number. The 25 meter minimum altitude is cited for the export variant FD-2000, and while it is far more realistic for a land based SAM, it still appears excessively high to effectively intercept sea skimming cruise missiles whose terminal altitude may be as low as five to ten meters above sea level. On the other hand it is notable that the naval HHQ-9 likely features the same 180 kilogram fragmenting warhead as HQ-9 and FD-2000, which may feature a blast radius large enough to compensate for an insufficiently low minimum altitude and thus retain the capability to kill a sea skimming target.<br /> But despite all the above, there is reason to question whether the naval HHQ-9 may have a minimum altitude even lower than 25 meters, as land variants and naval variants of the same SAM may feature differing minimum altitudes, possibly due to the nature of more alternating terrain for a land based SAM which may produce greater clutter when trying to track a low flying target, as well as vertical features such as trees or buildings which may further limit the minimum range of a SAM (but also any incoming missile).<br /> For instance, the European SAMP/T long range land based SAM is a variant of the naval Aster 30 long range SAM. SAMP/T is cited by MBDA with a minimum altitude of 50 meters, however Aster 30 is well known to be capable of intercepting sea skimming targets at lower altitudes as well.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_224" style="width: 569px;"><a href="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/aster-30-sampt.jpg"><img alt="The European SAMP/T is a land based air defence system derived from the Aster 30 naval SAM. The manufacturer states SAMP/T to have a 50m minimum altitude, however the Aster 30 is also known to be capable of engaging very low altitude sea skimming targets" class=" wp-image-224" height="381" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/aster-30-sampt.jpg" width="569" /></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">The European SAMP/T is a land based air defence system derived from the Aster 30 naval SAM. The manufacturer states SAMP/T to have a 50m minimum altitude, however the Aster 30 is also known to be capable of engaging very low altitude sea skimming targets</figcaption></figure> Therefore, the minimum altitude of HHQ-9 is likely to be sufficient for intercepting sea skimming targets, and directly assuming HHQ-9 features the same effective range of its land based counterparts may be a significant error in logic.<br /> Indeed, given the role of HHQ-9 as the Chinese Navy’s primary long range naval SAM, it would be quite a limitation if it were incapable of intercepting low altitude sea skimming missiles.<br /> <br /> <h3> Guidance:</h3> HHQ-9’s guidance is another point of contention which has significant consequences regarding the capability of the missile.<br /> Semi active radar homing (SARH) missiles rely on an external source to illuminate a target, whereupon a seeker on the missile homes onto the reflected beam. For modern surface to air and air to air missiles (among other types), this illumination is typically necessary only during the terminal phase of engagement. For naval SAMs, this external illumination is usually provided by a fire control radar aboard a ship operating in the X band.<br /> Active radar homing (ARH) missiles however, feature a radar onboard the missile itself so that it can “self guide” itself during the terminal phase of engagement, and thus are sometimes described as “fire and forget”. This name is not entirely strictly true, because a missile equipped with ARH still has to rely on midcourse guidance provided by a ship or an aircraft via datalink, prior to the terminal phase.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_232" style="width: 550px;"><a href="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/homing.jpg"><img alt="A simplified diagram of SARH guidance, ARH guidance, and command guidance (unmentioned in the post)" class="size-full wp-image-232" height="253" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/homing.jpg" width="550" /></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">A simplified diagram of SARH guidance, ARH guidance, and passive guidance (unmentioned in the post)</figcaption></figure> However, one meaningful difference between SARH and ARH SAMs, is that SARH SAM equipped ships with older mechanically oriented fire control radar illuminators may not be capable of engaging as many targets simultaneously as a ship with ARH SAMs, due to the necessity of time sharing its illuminators during the terminal phase. A ship equipped with ARH SAMs on the other hand, do not require any support from the ship itself during the terminal phase. One method to increase the number of simultaneous engagements for SARH SAMs is by employing an X band active phased array radar, which can generate a substantially larger number of beams for terminal illumination at once compared to traditional single beam mechanically oriented illuminators.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_230" style="width: 583px;"><a href="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/SPG-62-terminal-illuminator.jpg"><img alt="Mechanically oriented single beam SPG-62 terminal illuminators aboard a Burke class DDG. Such illuminators may limit the number of targets which can be simultaneously engaged by SARH SAMs " class=" wp-image-230" height="437" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/SPG-62-terminal-illuminator.jpg" width="583" /></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Mechanically oriented single beam SPG-62 terminal illuminators aboard a Burke class DDG (they are the two satellites dish-esque antennae; a Burke is equipped with three SPG-62s whiel a Ticonderoga class CG is equipped with four). Such illuminators may limit the number of targets which can be simultaneously engaged by SARH SAMs</figcaption></figure> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_223" style="width: 639px;"><a href="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/APAR-x-band.jpg"><img alt="Thales APAR system, equipped aboard multiple classes of European frigates. The APAR system is capable of providing multiple beams for terminal illumination, allowing a ship with SARH SAMs to simultaneously engage far more targets simultaneously compared to a ship equipped with a fixed number of mechanically oriented illuminators" class=" wp-image-223" height="426" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/APAR-x-band.jpg" width="639" /></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Thales APAR system, equipped aboard multiple classes of European frigates. The APAR system is capable of providing multiple beams for terminal illumination, allowing a ship with SARH SAMs to simultaneously engage far more targets simultaneously compared to a ship equipped with a fixed number of mechanically oriented illuminators</figcaption></figure> In the case of HHQ-9, it is generally accepted that it is guided by ARH rather than SARH. Arguments that HHQ-9 may use older SARH guidance may have arisen due to rumours of the land based HQ-9 using Russian derived seekers with Track Via Missile type guidance, however this has never been substantiated by documents from the manufacturer. More importantly, the export variant FD-2000 itself features ARH guidance, therefore it is unlikely for the Chinese to be willing to export a missile variant with more capable guidance than what itself is fielding.<br /> Additional evidence which indicates the HHQ-9 fields ARH guidance, is the very visible lack of terminal illuminators aboard the 052C class DDG (as well as the 052D DDG, which is almost certainly equipped with an HHQ-9 variant as well). The 052C class DDG is equipped with the S band Type 346 active phased array radar. S band radars are insufficient to provide terminal guidance, which is usually provided by X band radars, but are sufficient for providing midcourse guidance data. Therefore, unless the Type 346 radar is actually an X band radar (which is an immensely unlikely prospect), then the only viable guidance solution remaining, is for HHQ-9 to be an ARH missile.<br /> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_225" style="width: 724px;"><a href="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/fd-2000-arh.jpg"><img alt="FD-2000 is an ARH guided SAM, and is the export variant of the land based HQ-9 SAM" class=" wp-image-225" height="480" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/fd-2000-arh.jpg" width="724" /></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">FD-2000 is an ARH guided SAM, and is the export variant of the land based HQ-9 SAM</figcaption></figure> <figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_226" style="width: 724px;"><a href="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/fd-2000-range-pic.jpg"><img alt="FD-2000 missile geometry" class=" wp-image-226" height="489" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/fd-2000-range-pic.jpg" width="724" /></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">FD-2000 missile geometry</figcaption></figure> <br /> <b> Variants:</b><br /> The <a href="http://plarealtalk.com/2015/11/15/profile-hhq-9-naval-sam/" target="_blank">HHQ-9 missile</a> will likely remain the mainstay long range SAM for the Chinese Navy, and will likely feature substantial upgrades to enhance its capability in the same way that the US Navy has continuously upgraded its Standard Missile family.<br /> Indeed, it has been suggested that an HHQ-9A variant with extended range that may already be in service. An HHQ-9B variant with additional imaging infrared seeker may also have been in development or be in development.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/hhq-9-ignition.jpg"><img alt="hhq-9 ignition" class=" wp-image-227 aligncenter" height="1027" src="http://plarealtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/hhq-9-ignition.jpg" width="705" /></a><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /></div>

HHQ-9 naval surface to air missile

HHQ-9 naval surface to air missile The HHQ-9 naval surface to air missile (SAM) is the primary air defence weapon aboard the 052C cl...

Read more »